Home → Module Library
The operational capability layer of the Legal AI OS.
Modules are the institutional artefacts a legal function runs to advance maturity, produce Defensibility evidence, and operate on canonical ground in front of a regulator or a board. Anchored across the 8 Pillars and 6 Operating Layers. Methodology-versioned. Editorially independent.
PILLAR
AUDIENCE
+ More filters– Fewer filters
49 Modules
GOV-03
AI Risk Register
Apply the Risk Taxonomy 2026 to identify, score, and mitigate AI risks across nine canonical classes — the register that makes your governance defensible.
Module
Initial setup 4–6 weeks; 2–4 hours per quarterly review cycle
View →
GOV-05
AI Incident Response Playbook
Detect, classify, escalate, and resolve AI incidents across all nine Risk Taxonomy 2026 classes — the playbook that closes the governance loop.
Module
Per incident; 15 minutes to activate; resolution timeline by severity; PIR within 30 days for Level 1–2
View →
GOV-08
Agentic Governance Charter
Establishes binding governance, mandatory safeguards, and approval authorities for all Agentic Tier 3 and Tier 4 AI deployments.
Module
Charter implementation 2–4 weeks; ongoing governance is continuous; annual reauthorisation per chartered tool.
View →
GOV-09
AI Evaluation Harness Specification
Specifies the standardised evaluation methodology, test suites, and pass thresholds for all AI tools before deployment and during ongoing operation.
Module
Initial evaluation 3–5 business days per tool (Tiers 0–2); 7–10 business days for Tier 3–4 including agentic supplement. Ongoing monitoring is continuous.
View →
GOV-10
AI Lifecycle Operating Manual
Maps the complete AI tool lifecycle from identification through retirement, integrating every governance module into a single coherent operational sequence.
Module
Stage 1–4 (Tiers 0–2): 2–5 business days per tool. Stage 1–4 (Tiers 3–4): 5–10 business days. Stage 5–6: Ongoing. Stage 7 standard: 2–4 weeks. Stage 7 emergency: 24–72 hours active response.
View →
GOV-11
AI Incident Disclosure Standard
Governs the organisation's obligations and procedures for disclosing AI incidents to clients, regulators, and professional bodies.
Module
Disclosure decision: 4–8 hours per incident; regulator notification preparation: 1–3 business days; client disclosure drafting: 1 business day per affected client.
View →
GOV-13
Evidence Register Architecture
Per AI system × per Risk Taxonomy 2026 class: the contemporaneous proof the function holds — the operational substrate of Defensibility.
Module
4 hours first run per system; 1 hour quarterly refresh per system
View →
GOV-14
Delegation-Authority Register Architecture
Per Tier 3 and Tier 4 capability: the named record of what the system may decide, within what scope, with which human accountable.
Module
2 hours first run per Tier 3+ capability; 30 minutes quarterly refresh
View →
GOV-15
Governance Operating Cadence
Committee calendar mapped to AI Lifecycle stages — Concept intake through Sunset closure — with standing agenda, quorum, and gate evidence requirements.
Module
One-time setup 3 hours; standing committee meetings 60–90 minutes per cadence
View →
GOV-16
Materiality Calibration Methodology
Per Tier 3+ capability: which decisions require Full HITL, Exception-triggered HITL, or Audit-only — calibrated quarterly as performance and regulatory context evolve.
Module
3 hours first run per capability; 1 hour quarterly refresh
View →
INS-01
AI Liability & Insurance Posture
Assess professional liability exposure, insurance coverage gaps, and vendor indemnification adequacy for AI tools across the Risk Taxonomy 2026 nine-class framework.
Module
1–2 days initial per tool; 2–4 hours per tool at renewal or quarterly review
View →
MAT-01
Maturity Grid
The canonical Year-1 maturity instrument — plots organisational Adoption against AI Sophistication on a 5×4 grid to produce a defensible quarterly position and Maturity Stack-linked progression evidence.
Module
1–2 days for baseline; 0.5 day per quarterly review; 1 day annual strategic refresh
View →
Advisory
The full operating system in one Programme.
Programme Design and Strategic Retainer engagements operate the canonical Module sequence end-to-end — Defensibility evidence produced, Maturity progression evidenced quarterly, methodology version pinned. The Module Library is the artefact; the engagement is the operating posture.
View Engagement Models