advanta

Home → Module Library

The operational capability layer of the Legal AI OS.

Modules are the institutional artefacts a legal function runs to advance maturity, produce Defensibility evidence, and operate on canonical ground in front of a regulator or a board. Anchored across the 8 Pillars and 6 Operating Layers. Methodology-versioned. Editorially independent.

PILLAR

AllP1 · StrategyP2 · DataP3 · TalentP4 · GovernanceP5 · Use CasesP6 · VendorP7 · MaturityP8 · Sustaining

MATURITY BAND

AllFoundationalOperationalIntegratedOptimisedDefensible

AUDIENCE

AllAI Governance LeadAll StaffBoard or Risk CommitteeData Protection OfficerExternal CounselGeneral CounselIT SecurityLegal OperationsManaging PartnerPeople and Development LeadProcurementRisk & ComplianceRisk and ComplianceSenior PartnersGC / CLOLegal OpsRisk
+ More filters

OPERATING LAYER

AllL-S · StrategyL-G · GovernanceL-E · ExecutionL-M · MeasurementL-O · OptimizationL-I · Intelligence

FORMAT

AllDiagnostic inputMethodologyModuleTelemetry source

DIFFICULTY

AllAdvancedFoundationalOperational

26 Modules

Module STR-02 sigil: Strategy pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module STR-02. The Pillar geometry encodes Strategy (Pillar 1); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P1· L-S

STR-02

AI Strategy Canvas

Facilitated canvas to define legal’s AI vision, ambition, ROAI targets, and augmentation roadmap.

Module

4–8 hour facilitated workshop plus 2-week stakeholder sign-off cycle

View →

Module STR-03 sigil: Strategy pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module STR-03. The Pillar geometry encodes Strategy (Pillar 1); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P1· L-S

STR-03

Risk Matrix — Use Case × Risk Taxonomy 2026 × Likelihood

Systematic risk-scoring framework for AI legal use cases aligned to Risk Taxonomy 2026.

Methodology

3–6 hours per use case; 2–3 days for full portfolio review

View →

Module STR-07 sigil: Strategy pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module STR-07. The Pillar geometry encodes Strategy (Pillar 1); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P1· L-G

STR-07

AI Task Force Charter

Stand up the AI governance body that owns strategy, AI BoM oversight, and DPS production for the legal department.

Module

Initial setup 90 days; ongoing 2–4 hours/month per core member plus quarterly reviews.

View →

Module SUS-05 sigil: Sustaining pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module SUS-05. The Pillar geometry encodes Sustaining (Pillar 8); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P8· L-G

SUS-05

Annual AI Audit Methodology

The canonical annual governance audit instrument for deployed legal AI — validates compliance, bias, and performance across all active AI systems and produces the DPS annual evidence refresh.

Module

6 weeks per annual cycle (1 week planning, 3 weeks assessment, 1 week analysis, 1 week reporting)

View →

Module SUS-10 sigil: Sustaining pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module SUS-10. The Pillar geometry encodes Sustaining (Pillar 8); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P8· L-G

SUS-10

Capability Portfolio Architecture

Every AI capability the function operates, classified by Lifecycle stage — the GC's situational awareness at a glance and the portfolio input for the Defensibility Posture Statement.

Module

2 hours first run; 30 minutes quarterly refresh

View →

Module TAL-01 sigil: Talent pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module TAL-01. The Pillar geometry encodes Talent (Pillar 3); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P3· L-E

TAL-01

AI Literacy Curriculum Architecture

Canonical training framework to build Defensible AI competency across all legal department roles.

Module

Foundational rollout: ~42 hours total across all tracks; ongoing: 4–8 hours per role annually for refresh and new tools.

View →

Module USE-01 sigil: Use Cases pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module USE-01. The Pillar geometry encodes Use Cases (Pillar 5); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P5· L-S

USE-01

Use Case Prioritization Methodology

The strategic use case selection instrument that evaluates AI opportunities across five dimensions including Risk Taxonomy 2026, gates vendor adoption via AI BoM, and connects the deployed portfolio to DPS Adoption lens evidence.

Module

4–6 hours initial workshop; 2–3 hours per quarterly refresh

View →

Module USE-02 sigil: Use Cases pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module USE-02. The Pillar geometry encodes Use Cases (Pillar 5); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P5· L-E

USE-02

Pilot Program Design

The canonical AI pilot execution instrument that structures three-phase deployments with Risk Taxonomy 2026 monitoring, AI BoM gating, and Phase 3 DPS evidence production feeding STR-08 ROAI tracking.

Module

90–180 days per pilot (2–4 weeks planning; 6–12 weeks implementation; 2–4 weeks evaluation)

View →

Module USE-03 sigil: Use Cases pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module USE-03. The Pillar geometry encodes Use Cases (Pillar 5); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P5· L-M

USE-03

Baseline Metrics Methodology

Establishes pre-implementation performance benchmarks across four measurement dimensions to enable objective ROAI demonstration and AI optimisation for legal departments.

Methodology

Approx. 18-week baseline sprint per engagement; re-baseline on major process or organisational change.

View →

Module VAL-01 sigil: Strategy pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module VAL-01. The Pillar geometry encodes Strategy (Pillar 1); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P1· L-M

VAL-01

ROAI Matrix Framework

Measure and demonstrate the return on AI investment across four value dimensions — operational, financial, cultural, and strategic — with direct linkage to the DPS Defensibility lens.

Module

Initial setup 2–4 weeks; 1–2 days per quarter for updates and reporting

View →

Module VEN-01 sigil: Vendor pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module VEN-01. The Pillar geometry encodes Vendor (Pillar 6); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P6· L-G

VEN-01

Vendor Evaluation Operating Methodology

Operates the canonical pre-procurement vendor evaluation methodology, gating Legal AI tools through Pass/Fail controls and five-dimension weighted scoring against Risk Taxonomy 2026.

Module

12-week evaluation cycle per vendor engagement, with 2–4 hours per week from core team

View →

Module VEN-02 sigil: Vendor pillar, Strategy layer, maturity bands 1 to 3.Deterministic sigil for Module VEN-02. The Pillar geometry encodes Vendor (Pillar 6); the top-right marker S encodes the Strategy layer; the baseline meter encodes maturity bands 1 to 3.S
P6· L-G

VEN-02

Vendor RFP Methodology

Structured RFP template for procuring legal AI solutions with defensible, risk-aware evaluation.

Module

2–4 weeks to draft and issue; 4–8 weeks for full RFP cycle depending on complexity.

View →

Advisory

The full operating system in one Programme.

Programme Design and Strategic Retainer engagements operate the canonical Module sequence end-to-end — Defensibility evidence produced, Maturity progression evidenced quarterly, methodology version pinned. The Module Library is the artefact; the engagement is the operating posture.

View Engagement Models